Revenge Of The Sith & Terrorism

I watched Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge Of The Sith today and could not help remembering the nonsense that the liberals were pushing near its release. They contended that the movie was a fantasy viewing of modern day America and portrayed President Bush as the Emporer (also the Sith Lord) and Darth Vader. The whole article is here.

I do recall at the time that intelligent people, ones who take the terrorism threat realistically viewed the film of an example of what happens if evil is not eliminated when the chance is available.

For those who are unfamiliar with the story, Obi Wan Kanobi has the chance to kill Darth Vader, but does not. Instead he leaves him to burn in the volcanic eruption. Unfortunately for the Jedi, the Emporer rehabilitated Vader into the monster of the original Star Wars trilogy.

The liberals would have us believe that terrorism would simply disappear if we chose to ignore it. Intelligent individuals know that true evil will always avenge their losses and they have proven themselves throughout the '90s with the first World Trade Center attack, the bombing of the U.S. Embassies and the U.S.S Cole.

Had Obi Wan killed Vader when he had the chance, the Emporer would have been easier to destroy and the original trilogy would never had been. It is possible that had Clinton attacked Al Queda and Iraq as he planned (see previous post) that 9/11 might not have occurred. I find it interesting that without this one event, President Bush might not have shown the strength of a leader, and subsequently would not have been re-elected.

The libs praise Clinton and her perverse lifestyle, yet never mention his major inadequecies when it comes to leadership. Clinton helped the liberals arch nemesis win a second term.